Religon Forum
- Cererean Princess
- Posts: 1657
- Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 3:05 pm
Religon Forum
Why can't we have a forum to talk about religon on.
Formerly DragonRider. Almost teenage me could have been more imaginative with names.
- Matrix Operator
- Posts: 2112
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 12:58 pm
- Location: Aboard Mark XIV No. 62 hovership "Mjolnir"
- Contact:
-
- The Endless Prophet
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:01 am
- Location: Ahead of the Game
- Contact:
The point of the religion forum would be to let user discuss religion issues without breaking forum rules. It'd be separate to stop the discussions of religion from overriding other forums like general and Dragon Discussions.
"Thunder is good, thunder is impressive, but it's lightning that does the work." ~Samuel Clemens
Mah Griffon is © Todd Lockwood.
Mah Griffon is © Todd Lockwood.
-
- Grand Master Venerable Dragon
- Posts: 830
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 11:57 pm
- Location: Wasting away in margaritaville
Still you do not need a entire area for this. All we need is a single thread with a warning about what the topic it. The only problem is it will need to be watched a lot for flame wars and other problems. We had a thread like this at another site I go. But that is the idea, say something in the idea of "This is the religion topic thread, please keep any and all subject on this topic here." And also a warning about all posters must keep in line. And I would suggest keep it a member only thread.
The victories from those skilled in warfare are not considered of great wisdom or courage, because their victories have no miscalculations
- SUN-TZU
- SUN-TZU
- Matrix Operator
- Posts: 2112
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 12:58 pm
- Location: Aboard Mark XIV No. 62 hovership "Mjolnir"
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 11:22 pm
I think we can agree that a new forum is not needed because the general forum already cover everything else that isn't about dragons, RPing and the website. Moreover, a few topics about a specific subject would probably not make a very active forum.
Also, as for not following the same rules as the rest of the board, I am not sure how to interpret this. Religion is covered by Rule #8 and not following this rule would mean having discussions from the standpoint of particular group, with the specific purpose of recruiting and preaching with the use of propaganda techniques (i.e. fallacies) and having people who try to ram their agenda down the throat of other people.
I don't think anyone here is advocating for this but I really recommend to read back my explanation behind Rule #8, as this rule doesn't forbid religious discussions as long as the persons involved in such discussions are able to bring logical arguments to support their point of view. By logical arguments, I mean something that is reasonable for everyone, no matter their beliefs.
Also, as for not following the same rules as the rest of the board, I am not sure how to interpret this. Religion is covered by Rule #8 and not following this rule would mean having discussions from the standpoint of particular group, with the specific purpose of recruiting and preaching with the use of propaganda techniques (i.e. fallacies) and having people who try to ram their agenda down the throat of other people.
I don't think anyone here is advocating for this but I really recommend to read back my explanation behind Rule #8, as this rule doesn't forbid religious discussions as long as the persons involved in such discussions are able to bring logical arguments to support their point of view. By logical arguments, I mean something that is reasonable for everyone, no matter their beliefs.
- Cererean Princess
- Posts: 1657
- Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 3:05 pm
Well, actually it kind of does. But that could just be the way I'm interpretating it.
And the bit that says 'no recruiting' and other stuff like that, how can you have a dbate if everyone has to be on the same side or can't try and convince people.
Say I started up a thread to convince people a creator xists? Would that be against the rules? Even if I cited external referances that were *scientific*?
And the bit that says 'no recruiting' and other stuff like that, how can you have a dbate if everyone has to be on the same side or can't try and convince people.
Say I started up a thread to convince people a creator xists? Would that be against the rules? Even if I cited external referances that were *scientific*?
Formerly DragonRider. Almost teenage me could have been more imaginative with names.
-
- British Redcoat
- Posts: 863
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:38 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
DragonRider:
Some peoples minds *will not* be changed even if scientific evidence is shoved somewhere a little more private.
For example, say a volcano is erupting near a long-standing town that's going to be devastated. Some people won't move because they just won't- it's personal choices.
Some peoples minds *will not* be changed even if scientific evidence is shoved somewhere a little more private.
For example, say a volcano is erupting near a long-standing town that's going to be devastated. Some people won't move because they just won't- it's personal choices.
The skeletons are playing a jig for you ...
... let's give 'em a merry dance
Aka Respergo
... let's give 'em a merry dance
Aka Respergo
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 11:22 pm
Recruiting/propaganda/preaching and discussing is two different things.
Someone recruiting/preaching means he won't change his opinion not matter what other people say. This implies not accepting evidences that go against his position. For example: after the other board member have pointed the many logical flaws in every of his argument, Person X keeps saying that position Y is the best.
Someone discussing means that the person has a position but is also willing to change that position if the other side bring convincing arguments against it. It also implies admitting to have a weak case (or no case at all) if too many of the person's arguments are invalidated.
As for a thread about whenever you trying to convince others that a creator exists, it depends in which category of people you stand.
Someone recruiting/preaching means he won't change his opinion not matter what other people say. This implies not accepting evidences that go against his position. For example: after the other board member have pointed the many logical flaws in every of his argument, Person X keeps saying that position Y is the best.
Someone discussing means that the person has a position but is also willing to change that position if the other side bring convincing arguments against it. It also implies admitting to have a weak case (or no case at all) if too many of the person's arguments are invalidated.
As for a thread about whenever you trying to convince others that a creator exists, it depends in which category of people you stand.
Last edited by Tempest on Sat Dec 01, 2007 8:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- G.E.E.K.
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 2:01 pm
- Location: G.E.E.K. HQ
DragonRider has a good point and I am like him. If I fight for something and then realize I can't win, I back down, I might hod a grudge for a while but I don't bring it up again. Personally I think a Forum solely about religion would just wast space and time.
P.S. (this is off topic) Tempest, Could you please PM Ruben the DragonLord to get him to stop posting new threads instead of replying as well as trying to get him to use better grammar and spelling, it would be greatly appreciated.
P.S. (this is off topic) Tempest, Could you please PM Ruben the DragonLord to get him to stop posting new threads instead of replying as well as trying to get him to use better grammar and spelling, it would be greatly appreciated.
Let us bring a new Golden Age to Dragnix.