O negative, really that great?

Use this forum for general topics or ones that aren't covered by any other forums. This forum is also for off-topic non-dragon related discussions.
User avatar
Cererean Princess
Posts: 1657
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 3:05 pm

Re: O negative, really that great?

Post by Corva »

Perhaps different types of vamps? Maybe evolution; afterall, Vampires who don't repluse their victims stand a much higher chance of feeding.

Twilight wasn't that bad, despite the romance parts. A bit is okay, just don't layer the book with it. Haven't seen the film, but I don't really want to. Especially given the screenshots...
Formerly DragonRider. Almost teenage me could have been more imaginative with names.
User avatar
G.E.E.K.
Posts: 482
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: G.E.E.K. HQ

Re: O negative, really that great?

Post by Dragon444 »

It took my friends nearly a year and a half to get me to even touch the book. I hated it for overshadowing so many other good books, such as every book by the author Amelia Atwater-Rhodes. Aside from that, it wasn't to bad. I still think Atwater-Rhodes' stuff is better, but Twilight wasn't to bad.

What it didn't need was all the hype it got. That was completely undeserved.
Let us bring a new Golden Age to Dragnix.
Post Reply