Page 2 of 2

Re: O negative, really that great?

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:29 am
by Corva
Perhaps different types of vamps? Maybe evolution; afterall, Vampires who don't repluse their victims stand a much higher chance of feeding.

Twilight wasn't that bad, despite the romance parts. A bit is okay, just don't layer the book with it. Haven't seen the film, but I don't really want to. Especially given the screenshots...

Re: O negative, really that great?

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:08 pm
by Dragon444
It took my friends nearly a year and a half to get me to even touch the book. I hated it for overshadowing so many other good books, such as every book by the author Amelia Atwater-Rhodes. Aside from that, it wasn't to bad. I still think Atwater-Rhodes' stuff is better, but Twilight wasn't to bad.

What it didn't need was all the hype it got. That was completely undeserved.