Page 1 of 1
Kings of the beach
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:48 pm
by raptor
Are dragons reptiles or amphilians? I have read some stories were it has smooth skin that was slimy instead of scales. Or they closely related to birds?( Some have feathers)
Re: Kings of the beach
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:57 pm
by Falconer
There are a few theories on this.
Common Theory 1: Dragons are reptiles, probably in the same category as dinosaurs. They could be warm-blooded or cold blooded, but most likely the former.
Common Theory 2: Dragons are more avian in nature. This is tied to the theory that birds evolved from dinosaurs.
My Theory: Birds, mammals, amphibians, reptiles, insects- I believe dragons are a separate Phylum altogether.
Re: Kings of the beach
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:19 pm
by raptor
If this is true, could it be possible that they started out as repitles or amphilihans and evole into a serpearte speices?
Re: Kings of the beach
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 3:38 pm
by Forgotten Dragon's Ire
Well every creature did have the same beginning that of bacteria and they all evolved from them just they each became so different from others that we had to classify their differences
Re: Kings of the beach
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:27 pm
by kroatone
In my opinion dragons are a seperate phylum, as Falconer already suggested.
Re: Kings of the beach
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:05 am
by vampirehunter42
I would not think they are amphibians as we define them. Most of them are "lesser" animals that need to stay wet. They would be closer to reptiles though. Yes, they would have branched off away from them.
Re: Kings of the beach
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 5:57 pm
by raptor
Would they be closer related to snakes or lizards?
Re: Kings of the beach
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:14 pm
by kroatone
actually the closet relative would be crocodile. (and no I am not quoting the animal planet's dragon special). The two animals have a striking number of similarities.
Re: Kings of the beach
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:49 pm
by Falconer
aquadraca wrote:Would they be closer related to snakes or lizards?
I would have to say neither, since both are cold-blooded and powered flight requires an endothermic physiology. If anything, I agree with kroatone, they're closest to crocodiles.
Re: Kings of the beach
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:57 pm
by raptor
What about the ones that look like snakes?
Re: Kings of the beach
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:10 pm
by Falconer
If they're dragons, then they're in the same family... they may be a separate Class or Order altogether.
Re: Kings of the beach
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:13 pm
by kroatone
yep
Re: Kings of the beach
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:56 pm
by Drakel
agreed
Re: Kings of the beach
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:30 pm
by zerince
and you must remember each type of dragon has it's own adaptations for were it lives for exsaple the chines dragon would have lived in a bambo jungle most likly so it would have to be mor slender than the other dragons to move throu the forest to catch any land-prey
Re: Kings of the beach
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:38 pm
by alondor
something that has been bothering me is that you guys are using the wrong word, they would be in the same phylum as us and reptiles and birds and all other things that poccess backbones. no what they would have their own section of would be a class. other then that they would be closely related to crocodilesyes
Re: Kings of the beach
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:22 am
by zerince
i see your point